Midnight riders

The all-night Pathmark had an ambiance and a community all its own.

Well, maybe “community” is stretching it. At 2 a.m., the Pathmark had an assortment of fellow travelers who only slightly acknowledged each other’s presence as they scooped up everything from the cliché bread and milk to a full week’s — or full fortnight’s — load of groceries.

Those folks — often, myself included — qualified as visitors, or as casual members of the aforementioned community. The permanent “residents” — shelf stockers, Michelle the cashier who did other stuff but I’m not sure what, truck unloaders — to them, Pathmark in the wee hours was their temple.

People who work at night, or whose jobs start at zero dark thirty or end at bar-closing time, might as well be elves, considering how they’re often viewed. What they do seems to happen magically, reliably, predictably. Often quite creatively. Just as often, not. And that’s OK. It’s all necessary.

Think about who those folks are. We’ve met the Pathmark natives; the visitors included women in surgical scrubs, men and women ostensibly in the custodial field, the occasional peace office or first responder, new parents (usually dads) lost in the baby food aisle, fashionably dressed commuter-type people, and past-deadline journalists.

Every one of them — every one of us — are doing something at night so the rest of the world can function during the day.

Though it’s been years since I worked the evening or night shift steadily, I still come alive after the sun goes down. It’s odd, considering I have … well, not exactly a fear of the dark, but a low, unconscious dread of what may lurk in the uncertainty that darkness engenders.

I find I’m most creative and most productive under artificial light, the gloom barely an arm’s length away. Other people draw more deeply into their own selves as any given day winds down, which offers me the solitude I need to concentrate most fully.

I love people, but, oh, that Cone of Silence!

I think again of the night crew at the late, lamented Pathmark.

I was in the store more than once when Michelle announced lunch break (hey, it’s lunch when it’s in the middle of your day, regardless of what hours you consider to be your day). But unlike the chatty, energetic midday meals shared by coworkers I came to see in my 9-to-5 days, the night guys scattered, ate quietly, and with their body language threw a DMZ around themselves.

Which made me review the others in the store. Most of them, and especially the regulars, had portable DMZs around themselves. Not antisocial, but asocial. 

Because this was their time, whether by choice in the first place or by making the best of the situation.

Some social scientists say that we need alone time in amounts that correspond directly with how deeply, how intensely we absorb the world around us, and especially how deeply we connect with other people, how much of their crosses we help them carry.

That may well explain it: This disconnection, enabled by a night schedule, can help people be better spouses, parents, friends, children of the Almighty. I prefer to believe this, and not that those people are cranky sourpusses.

Of course, with the store long gone, I’ll never know for sure.

Bon voyage, bon mots

A work in progress. Contributions welcome.

Years ago, when ads for smoking were permitted on television, one brand ginned up a faux debate about how grammatical its slogan was or wasn’t.

I have no idea why; did they think people intelligent enough to know spelling and syntax and the like were stupid enough to suck on cancer sticks?

Anyway, the fine folks from North Carolina staged a quibble-fest between their existing “Winston tastes good, like a cigarette should” and “Winston tastes good, as a cigarette should.”

(Winston tastes like $#1t, as all cigarettes do. But that’s off the topic.)

This series of ads capitalized on the notion that language is always changing, evolving, reflecting the times and the people who speak it. Those of us who make, or have made, their livings shaping written or spoken communication know we walk a Wallenda-style tightrope balancing grammatical purists on one side and vernacular evolutionaries on the other.

My first real head-butt came early in my editing career when the estimable Robert Wright, he of later accomplishments and prestige in historical and scientific journalism, insisted on using “presently” interchangeably with “currently.” His insistence: It’s a variation of “at present,” having shed its “momentarily” definition the way a snake sheds its skin.

Bob and his allies won this battle; scarcely anyone outside of broadcasters on the BBC and scholars of Shakespeare use “presently” in its classical form. Far fewer people would understand it, even in context.

And so goes the vernacular. Language belongs to those who understand and are understood.

Still, I’d argue that we usually have a plethora of synonymous options that would obviate rewriting a definition merely because a word seems as if it should mean something it doesn’t. “Presently” has “present” within it, right? Or so goes the argument.

Interestingly enough, the clarity and spatiality that, first, CDs and now nonstop streaming services added to the flood of remastered 1960s rock also exposed us to lyrics we could only guess at when we heard them on 16-transistor Kent AM radios. British and some American lyricists peppered their tunes with allusions to Tolkien — “…in the darkest depths of Mordor / I met a girl so fair / But Gollum, the evil one, crept up / And slipped away with her” — and dozens of other literary lights who used florid language. Who used “presently” to mean “shortly.”

Please note, “In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida” doesn’t count.

For reasons that will become clearer early this December, I’ve had The Beatles’ “When I’m Sixty-Four” kicking around my brain a lot, and one adjective my mother’s mother used a lot — “dear” — has lost any meaning save “sweetheart.”

   Every summer we can rent a cottage
   In the Isle of Wight, if it’s not too dear
   We shall scrimp and save…

The List

Presently — Then: shortly, in a little while. Now: now.

Dear — Then: expensive. Now: loved, lovely, cute.

…to be continued. What are your words?